The Financial Times Editor, Roula Khalaf, offers her selection of preferred stories in a complimentary weekly newsletter known as the Editor’s Digest.
As the UK approaches the Budget announcement on October 30, the first under a Labour government since 2010, the atmosphere has been somewhat pessimistic. The Labour party has taken control of a heavily indebted and sluggish economy, with anticipated tax increases. Despite promises not to raise taxes on “working people,” there is a predicted £40 billion gap in public finances, alongside plans to escalate borrowing, causing concern among businesses, investors, and markets.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces the task of alleviating these worries by demonstrating her capability to stabilize the British economy and create a path for a brighter future. To accomplish this, her budget should meet three essential criteria.
Firstly, the budget’s measures should aim to enhance economic growth. Although the IMF recently increased its forecast for the UK’s growth in 2024, the country’s long-term economic trajectory remains restrained. Reeves must ensure that the current low-growth, high-tax environment in Britain does not persist.
Achieving this goal will be challenging. The government’s intention to boost public investment and streamline the planning system marks a promising start. However, any tax-raising strategies should not overly burden those who generate wealth. Additionally, Reeves needs to present robust reform plans for the tax and pension systems to foster growth and investment. Businesses will scrutinize her proposals comprehensively, and if the Budget imposes excessive strain without addressing broader challenges to scaling, hiring, and investing, the UK’s competitiveness could suffer.
The second criterion concerns the credibility of Reeves’ spending plans. The chancellor has presented this Budget as a step towards addressing the pressure on Britain’s public services, with no return to austerity and an initiation of public investment. Funding for hospitals, courts, and schools lays a crucial foundation for the economy, but spending should be accompanied by reforms to increase public sector productivity and achieve savings. Without this, the rising demands on public finances could lead to an even larger state apparatus.
Regarding investment, Reeves should direct any additional borrowing toward growth-oriented projects, especially to enhance UK infrastructure. However, rather than excessive spending, the focus should be on appraising and executing investments cost-effectively, an area where the UK has historically struggled. Increased funding for public services and investments is justifiable, but only if utilized wisely.
Lastly, the chancellor must gain the confidence of financial markets. The main fiscal rule to balance day-to-day budgets indicates a commitment to fiscal prudence and generates borrowing capacity for investment. Bondholders seek assurance of discipline through a credible, debt-focused fiscal rule and proof that funds will be allocated to productive investments.
It is anticipated that a new measure or definition of debt will be introduced to increase borrowing latitude. Writing in the Financial Times, Reeves has also detailed new institutions to oversee spending scrutiny. She must clarify how any additional fiscal space will be used responsibly to prevent higher gilt yields from exacerbating fiscal challenges.
In recent declarations, Labour has articulated that the Budget aims to rejuvenate public services, encourage investment, support wealth creators, and fill financial gaps. Reeves’ announcements will need to sufficiently address each area, even if not all goals can be achieved completely.
For a government elected to transform Britain’s economic landscape, the principal test for the chancellor lies in setting the country on a more prosperous course. Emphasizing growth, judicious spending, and a credible fiscal framework will be crucial.
