Placeholder canvas
4.9 C
Friday, February 23, 2024
HomeLatest NewsRepublicans' False and Misleading Claims at First Biden Impeachment Hearing Fact-Checked

Republicans’ False and Misleading Claims at First Biden Impeachment Hearing Fact-Checked


Related stories

Rumor: Xbox’s Hi-Fi Rush to Launch on ‘Switch 2’ According to Reports

Nintendo's recent Partner Showcase revealed that two Xbox games...

Advancement of two income tax reduction plans at Iowa statehouse.

The Iowa Senate Ways and Means committee has moved...

Rivian, former EV darling, now faces challenges in the electric truck market.

Rivian Automotive Inc., previously hailed by investors as a...

Hillside collapse near California dam claims lives of two children.

Two children tragically died after a hillside by a...

Gmail shutting down hoax debunked – here’s what really happened!

A hoax news release falsely claiming that Google was...

In the first hearing of the impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden, Republicans on the House Oversight Committee have made a series of false and misleading claims. Republican Rep. James Comer stated that the committee had uncovered evidence that the Bidens and their associates created over 20 shell companies and received over $20 million between 2014 and 2019. While the $20 million figure is accurate for Biden’s family and associates, there is no public evidence that President Biden himself received any of this money. Additionally, a large portion of the money went to Hunter Biden’s business partners, not the Biden family directly.

Another false claim made by Republican Rep. Jim Jordan is that Hunter Biden admitted he was unqualified to sit on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. However, Hunter Biden actually said in a 2019 interview that he was completely qualified for the role and defended his qualifications. He acknowledged that his last name played a role in his appointment to the board but rejected claims that he wasn’t qualified.

Furthermore, Republicans have cited documents obtained from IRS whistleblowers to argue that the Justice Department blocked investigators from asking about Joe Biden in a search warrant related to Hunter Biden’s overseas dealings. However, the instruction to exclude Joe Biden’s name was given because there was no legal basis to include it in the warrant. It’s important to note that this occurred during the Trump presidency and does not prove any pro-Biden meddling by the Biden-era Justice Department.

In addition, Comer mentioned that the committee had found evidence of wire transfers sent to Hunter Biden from Chinese nationals during Joe Biden’s presidential campaign, with Joe Biden’s home listed as the beneficiary address. However, it is crucial to understand that the listing of Joe Biden’s address does not demonstrate that he received any of the money. There may well be benign reasons for the inclusion of the address, as Hunter Biden has lived at his father’s home at times and listed that address on his driver’s license.

Overall, the Republican claims made during the impeachment inquiry hearing have not provided conclusive evidence of wrongdoing by President Joe Biden and have often omitted critical context.

Source link


- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here