DoorDash has requested that a California Superior Court judge dismiss a lawsuit filed by Uber, which accuses DoorDash of limiting competition by pressuring restaurant owners into exclusive agreements.
In its motion, DoorDash contends that Uber’s claims lack merit. In a statement on its website, DoorDash described the lawsuit as a calculated tactic by a competitor frustrated with genuine competition. The company expressed disappointment in Uber, a firm once renowned for competitive innovation.
DoorDash further stated its intent to defend itself vigorously, emphasizing its commitment to fair competition and delivering value to merchants. A hearing is scheduled for July 11 in the California Superior Court in San Francisco County.
Uber’s lawsuit, initiated in February, alleges that DoorDash leverages its market dominance to impose penalties or demote businesses on its app if restaurants refuse exclusive deals.
In response to DoorDash’s request, Uber conveyed via a statement to TechCrunch that it believes coercion, not competition, is at play when restaurants must choose between unfavorable terms or retaliation. Uber affirmed its commitment to supporting merchants and ensuring a fair competitive landscape, anticipating presenting the facts in court.
Uber has requested a jury trial in its complaint but has not specified the damages sought.
Separately, Deliveroo confirmed that DoorDash has proposed acquiring the European food delivery company for $3.6 billion.
